The Argument Every Person Who Isn’t Stoned is Tired Of.

I live in Portland, which means I have to put up constantly with the scent of weed and stoners with dreadlocks in their hipster gear drinking Pabst. But I also am the daughter of a retired cop, which means I grew up knowing that illegal = not good and drugs = even more not goodness.

Pot seems to be the current obsession of America, but I’ve heard about it so much in this week in particular, that I’m going to explode if I don’t rant and rave about it. And I’ve already ranted once, so that really tells you something.

I am no stranger to the “pot should be legalized” argument. Rather against my will, I hear it all the time. See, kids, unlike most people in my high school, I didn’t do pot in high school. I also didn’t do it in college. I didn’t do it in middle school. I do not do it at a party, I do not do it in a box, with a fox, I do not do it, Hipster Marty (aahhh, it was Seuss Week at work). So I have never smoked pot. Nor cigarettes. Nor drugs of any kind. The only underage drinking I did was the legal kind, where it’s with parental consent and supervision. But if I had friends over, they were not allowed any, as that WOULD have been illegal, and I was horrified when my best friend in high school told me she had started drinking.

People try to normalize illegal behavior in teens and point out that “They grew up alright.” This frustrates me, because I so rarely see that happening. Let’s just take an example of that best friend. She didn’t even graduate high school. Is the connection then that all drunk teenagers don’t graduate? Of course not. But then again, I DIDN’T drink in high school, and I graduated from a private university early with honors. There are other factors at work there, but I’d like to thank the fact that I didn’t waste my time drinking, smoking and f–king throughout my school years as a part of my success. Because I certainly had plenty of acquaintances that did – and they usually flunked their classes.

But let’s focus on the issue at hand. Marijuana, and why it should be legalized. This is a summary of an argument I had with my uncle this last week, and it covered all the standard points that are thrown at me every time one of my friends feels like lecturing me on the wonders of drugs.

His point: Tax revenue from legalizing marijuana.
My counterpoint: People always try this one as a very PRACTICAL reason for instituting marijuana in daily life, and I never buy it. Usually I’m just told that I’m wrong (because that’s winning a debate), but here we actually discussed the point. Taxes are not free money. They’re actually rather expensive money. Because let’s consider the fact that when you legalize a previously illegal substance, it’s a TREMENDOUS amount of work and capital; you must build the infrastructure of dispensaries, you must train civil servants to dispense and supervise it, you must train IRS agents to create and then implement the proper tax on it. Taxed items are also generally more expensive than their privatized counterparts, and throughout our history, America has been GOOD at avoiding taxes whenever possible. With such a well entrenched black market, people will have every opportunity of sticking it to the man, albeit less dramatically since what they’d be doing would be sort of legal ish.
Let’s also remember why we tax such “vices” as cigarettes and alcohol – to discourage their use. Occasionally it will make people go out of their way to avoid the tax or simply pay more for their addiction, but a great many people stop their bad behavior when the price goes up. The idiocy of legalizing marijuana and then taxing it is such that we really stand to lose more than we stand to gain.

His point: Marijuana is “safer” than cigarettes/alcohol, and those are legal.
My counterpoint: This is another one I’m disgustingly tired of. I’ve been told my a registered, practicing nurse that this is not the case, so I don’t know why Jo Blow who hasn’t even taken a class in medicine keeps telling me this. For starters, the weed you’re smoking is not the same as what your idiotic parents were smoking during the 60s (mine too, but one stopped after trying it and the other is allergic). It is much, much, MUCH more potent and destructive. Also, it isn’t grown in government overseen soil where everything’s all nice and clean (as clean as soil is) and, you know, battery acid isn’t leaking. That isn’t the case with weed. It’s chock full of metals your body wasn’t really meant to take. Because hey, who’s going to stop them?
It is true that marijuana doesn’t have the same types of evil that cigarettes do, but I had a ranting/informative discussion with Hanna on this subject while stuck in traffic this week. People are selective when it comes to the evils of cigarettes versus marijuana. The anti-smoking campaign has long made it known that smoking kills, though taking your first puff won’t ACTUALLY kill you and this will be several decades down the road, depending on your penchant for the stink weed. For whatever reason, long-term effects with pot are ignored. It slows down reactions in your brain considerably after multiple uses, in effect making you more of an idiot than you were before you started. So the argument that people who smoke weed aren’t stupid is not in fact quite true (Hanna will no doubt comment correcting me and adding proper terminology, so please forgive errors in my memory).
In case alcohol remains a cheap target for pro-pot people, let us rectify that now. It is possible to have a sip of wine or a bottle of beer without getting drunk (unless you’re me). It is not possible to have a joint of marijuana without getting high. Also, when I go out with my friends, their drinking does not get me drunk. I’ll pass on the second-hand high, thanks.

His point: Drugs were really only outlawed in 1918.
My counter-point: Even so, the history of use with drugs pales in comparison with that of alcohol. Look into the truly ancient cultures and you will find the beginnings of spirits. Drugs are in there, but not as much and not so prominently. Drugs have been used ceremonially – but not as often or as extensively. Ale was a replacement for water during the Middle Ages, when water supplies were highly unsanitary. Coke was not a replacement for bread. If we may only colloquially use the phrase “Eat, Drink, and Be Merry,” we can point out that it is not “Let’s get stoned off our asses.” Certainly drugs were in use. But not like good, old-fashioned, Mother’s own booze.

His point: Of course there’s violence over drugs now, look at the violence of the Prohibition era!
My counter-point: The idea that drugs are somehow the happy, family friendly alternative to other vices is laughable. America’s appetite for drugs is fueling a drug war in Mexico. Legalize all the drugs you want today, but I can tell you that tomorrow the drug cartels will not set up taco shops. Nor is it truly the same as Prohibition. There has NEVER been the extent of use of drugs in America as drink was before 1920. Except maybe the 80s. Just….the 80s. Once again, it’s a comparison that doesn’t really WORK. Drugs and alcohol and the cultural constructs thereof are not the same. Prohibition is not the same as outlawing marijuana.

My uncle did something that has never happened to me in the drug debate: he conceded. He said “Maybe you’re right. That’s just my position on it.” And we dropped the subject like reasonable adults. That makes him infinitely more mature than the friends who have forced this debate on me, but I did feel satisfied having actually won.

I don’t want to seem completely unreasonable. Naturally there would be SOME downturn in violence SOME places if marijuana were legal. But it would acquire the same social problems cigarettes and alcohol have gained in the last twenty years; no smoking in public or in bars, campaigns nationwide discussing the health implications, and instead of drunk drivers we could look forward to high drivers. Out of the frying pan and into the fire, what?

Now, legalizing prostitution? All for it. Let’s save that for another rant, though.


About emilydnelson

A recent graduate of Hofstra University with a B.A. in anthropology, Emily is like every other twenty-two year old on the planet - trying to figure out what the hell to do now. Follow as she struggles with writing, her social work job, and bopping from coast to coast.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Argument Every Person Who Isn’t Stoned is Tired Of.

  1. That Hanna Creature says:

    So, I know this is weeks ago, and everything in your life right now is about bloody horrible things so…I thought my thoughts on this subject might make you smile.

    Yep, booze and cigarettes are pretty fucking bad for you. Deadly, even, if they’re abused. Hell, people have doctors tell them straight up that if they didn’t quit drinking entirely, they’ll be dead within the next five years. I’ve never heard a doctor tell someone that about their weed smoking. Drunk driving and smoking-related lung cancer have literally killed millions.

    In fact, here’s a not-at-all-retarded rebuttal from a legalization advocate in response to a “Foundation for a Drug-Free World” pamphlet that claims pot is more dangerous than alcohol. In case you didn’t read that, it’s exactly what you’d expect from a site that runs its articles over a background of marijuana leaf gifs, versus a highly generalized and exaggerated claim from an organization that is obviously anti-pot. The argument being, “Pot is worse than booze!” “Nuh-uh, alcohol is worse!”

    But here’s the thing about that entire debate: It doesn’t fucking matter.

    Throwing out death tolls from tobacco smoke, drunk driving and liver disease makes perfect sense as an argument for making those things illegal. It makes zero sense when trying to convince somebody to make pot legal. Don’t you understand that “It will kill fewer people than cigarettes!” could apply to fucking anything? You could pass a law that lets 12 year olds carry concealed guns to school and it’d kill fewer people than drunk driving.

    If the argument is that pot is the safer choice, then by that rationale, it’s also safer than deep-throating a cactus or mouth-fucking a rattlesnake. Is someone obligating you to choose between the two? There’s not a third option of just not doing either of them? That has baffled me for years, and I still don’t understand it. But I’ve heard it. A lot. As if the legalization of one unhealthy activity obligates us to legalize every single thing that’s less lethal than that.

    You have to remember that the people who have the power to change these laws are old, rich, stuffy white guys who for the most part don’t smoke weed. When they hear rebuttals like this, they’re picturing a six year old kid stomping his foot and screaming at his mother, “Why can’t I play that game? Jimmy’s mom lets him play GTA, and that’s way worse!” The end result is still that you’re arguing for the right to make things worse than they were before.

    • emilydnelson says:

      I love you so hardcore, and wish to bear your children.
      i.e. Yes, you made me smile a bunch (but you always do!).
      Another sound and enlightening approach to a less than sound or enlightened topic.

  2. Pingback: Thinking, Thinking | The Undiscovered Country

  3. Pingback: The Undiscovered Country

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s